Welcome to The Rumor Mill promotional discussion forums...

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Holy ****


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 42
Date:
Holy ****
Permalink   
 


Whoa.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

I probably failed but was a fair exam.



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 42
Date:
Permalink   
 

Yes. OO's from 2006. Indeed.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Congratulations and best of luck to all who took the test. About 3 months ago I realizwasn't hadn't put enough effort into ad tidying that this test demands and called it quits. 

That migt have been the best decision I have ever made considering what I am hearing about the difficulty of the exam. 

 

 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 42
Date:
Permalink   
 

According to r/s, I passed- but the effort I put in was great and should not be required to "just pass."

A line from the explorer procedure? Really?
There are over 960 procedures we are responsible for, not including oo's, penal law (crim mis, really?) legal, etc...
Each has several lines, lists, dates, tow truck driver uniforms, christmas tree acquisition, gross inconsistencies between procedures, 49 distribution, defunct units, defunct equipment, defunct green-screen programs using function keys, wordiness in unreadable procedures, odd numbering schemes in procedures, exceptions, logs for stamps, lists of disorder supplies, #1 thru #4 books, etc...

Why are we testing on lines in a procedure of little substance? Why not general ideas/themes/concrete responsibilities?

Use your nose. It stinks.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard